Thank you for contacting us.
We will get back to you as soon as possible.

Contact us


You acknowledge that by submitting your details via this page, you consent to us processing your personal data in accordance with our privacy policy.

Important ruling on land rights

Important ruling on land rights

A recent ruling in the Court of Appeal confirms that land owners do not have to take costly steps if they want to prevent people from parking on their land.

In the case of Winterburn v Bennett [2016], the court was asked to determine whether or not individuals could prevent someone from claiming an easement over their land simply by erecting notices which clearly indicate that the area of land is for private use only.

In a judgment last month, the Court of Appeal said it was satisfied that in this case, the notices were in themselves sufficient and the owner was not obliged to take any further steps to prevent people acquiring rights over the land.

The legal dispute centred around customers and suppliers of a fish and chip shop using the car park of the nearby Conservative Club, which on occasion caused difficulties for the club’s visitors.

Throughout the period involved there was a sign placed at the entrance to the car park which read: “Private car park. For the use of club patrons only. By order of the committee” and a similar notice was in place in a clubhouse window.

The owners of the fish and chip shop argued that their customers had parked there “as of right” for more than 20 years, without permission and “without force”. The Court of Appeal had to consider whether the continuous presence of these signs was sufficient to render the parking by those using the chip shop as “contentious”.

It was decided that in cases such as this one, where a land owner had made their position obvious through clearly visible signs, they did not have to take further steps such as confronting the perpetrators in person or instigating legal proceedings. For this purpose “force” did not mean violence. Parking where there was a clear sign prohibiting this was sufficient “force” for these purposes.

The case reaffirms principles previously established four years ago in Taylor v Betterment Properties (Weymouth) Ltd [2012].

For more information on land rights, please contact Victoria Sandberg in our Commercial Property team.

 

Please note the contents of this note are given for information only and must not be relied upon. Legal advice should always be sought in relation to specific circumstances.

Protecting and Enforcing your Intellectual Property – Part 3 (Tuesday 18 June 2019)
18 Jun 2019 - posted in Events

Longmores Solicitors are, in collaboration with Hertfordshire Chamber of Commerce, invite you to this breakfast seminar on the subject of Intellectual Property, the last in...

Read more
The Top 5 Reasons to Trade Mark your Brand
17 Jun 2019 - posted in Blog
Author: Rina Sond

Businesses often ask why they need to bother trade marking their brand name or logo. There are a number of reasons for this, but I...

Read more
Keep It In The Family (Friday 14 June 2019)
14 Jun 2019 - posted in Events

Are you thinking about updating your will or worried about inheritance tax? Longmores are holding a free seminar on powers of attorney, care home fees...

Read more